🔗 Share this article

Loved ones whose relatives buried in resting places vulnerable to coastal erosion state that a lack of decision on how best to tackle the problem is causing them unnecessary distress about the final resting places of their loved ones.

An Impending Danger to Ancient Churchyards

Local authorities have singled out three burial grounds in the communities of Happisburgh, Trimingham, and Mundesley as being in danger of being swallowed by the sea in the next few generations.

A recent report on the issue sets out a range of possible actions, from doing nothing to exhuming remains and relocating them in more secure sites. Officials maintain it is for the community to decide how to move forward.

“At the moment we’re in limbo. It causes me distress. My parents wanted this to serve as their last home, but it won't be because of the sea.”

Projections indicate at least a portion of one churchyard could fall into the sea in the next 80 years, but some locals fear it will happen far earlier. “In my view it’s got under 20 years, if you consider what’s happened in the last 30 years,” a farmer stated.

Haunted by the Past

One resident recalled a childhood visit to the neighbouring settlement of Eccles, which has largely vanished into the sea, including its place of worship and burial ground.

“It was possible to see human remains,” she said. “Some have this idealized notion that people’s remains will just get carried away to sea. They won’t. People will take bones as souvenirs and go plundering graves in search of treasures. That is completely undignified.”

“I’m worried that the same thing that befell at Eccles will occur at Happisburgh and there’ll be skeletons on the beach. I’d be disgusted by that.”

A Soldier's Resting Place in Jeopardy

Along the shoreline is situated the burial plot of a former paratrooper who died while serving abroad. His mother said she could not sleep after learning her child's final plot might one day be relocated.

“It does disturb me to consider this won’t be his permanent resting place,” she said. “To our family it’s an significant site to visit.”

In her view, new interments should stop but says it is premature to disturb existing graves. “What I would choose for now is to do nothing and closely monitor, but an timely resolution needs to be made when a critical moment has been attained.”

Searching for Answers and Certainty

The lack of agreement over the timing and method to tackle the challenge has resulted in bereaved families feeling exasperated and worried.

Several families want more sea defences to delay the unavoidable loss and to allow funerals to continue for now. Others contend the time for relocation is drawing near.

“It is very emotive,” said one relative. “The council’s report was thorough, but now there’s confusion about how it is taken forward. And all parties is avoiding responsibility over who is accountable.”

A coastal manager said the burial sites were under the care of the church authorities. “In the end it is up to them to decide the path to take. We are here to assist them through that journey with residents.”

He added there was time to consider all the choices. “We are talking many years before it starts to be lost.”

“Currently, there exists no common view on what should happen yet. It requires productive community discussions to discover the appropriate answers for each community.”

The prospect of the loss of the historic sites was described as one of “immense sorrow for the local community,” but faith leaders also spoke of a doctrine in resurrection, providing a theological perspective on the temporal disappearance of sacred ground.